Browse or run a search for Chasemore V. Richards in the American Encyclopedia of Law, the Asian Encyclopedia of Law, the European Encyclopedia of Law, the UK Encyclopedia of Law or the Latin American and Spanish Encyclopedia of Law.. Chasemore V. Richards in Historical Law . Over 47,000 legal and related terms and definitions, on all aspects of law, tax, public administration and political science. Updates continuously as new terms and definitions are published. Definitions supported by published research from over 130 jurisdictions. Only full case reports are accepted in court. This case considered the right to intercept and harvest groundwater percolating through the soil. i)Ryland V.Fletcher ii) Shiffman's case iii) Peters V. Prince of Wales Theatre,iv) Carstirs V. Taylor v) Richards V. Lothian vi) Green V. Chelsea Water Works Company vii) Crow hurst V. A.B. What did the court decide regarding the issues? … RICHARD v. RICHARD 1930 OK 181 286 P. 900 142 Okla. 302 Case Number: 19400 Decided: 04/15/1930 Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Through percolation, the water gathered in the well of deft. 1, 261 N.W.2d 766 (1978). The World's Largest Free and Online Legal Dictionary. Rep. 1223 [1843], and Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L. Mr. For more information about Historical Law Books and Legal Documents, see Legal Encyclopedia of Historical Books and Documents and Legal Encyclopedia of Books and Documents of the 20th Century. Search for legal acronyms and/or abbreviations containing Chasemore V. Richards in the Legal Abbreviations and Acronyms Dictionary. United States v. Richardson Case Brief - Rule of Law: Standing is denied to "generalized grievances." 316. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby discontinued the underground water supply of stream. Cas., 364; Frazier v. Through percolation the water gathered in the well of deft. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream. Entries Sitemap 2 1 That case was afterwards affirmed, and is a leading case on the subject of underground water, Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. C. 349. The law stated by this House in Chasemore v. Richards(1) cannot be questioned. owner has the right to do whatever he Legal Definition and Related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards, Related Entries of Chasemore V. Richards in the Encyclopedia of Law Project. If you search for an entry, then decide you want to see what another legal encyclopedia says about it, you may find your entry in this section. The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream. The issue is whether lack of conspicuousness allows for the loss of property use as desired by an individual in an easement Does it matter that the noise was there for an extended period but did not cause a nuisance until recently? 3) Chasemore v/s Richards 1859 Fact- Plaintiff was running a mill on his own land, and for this purpose he was using the water of the stream for a long time. Entries Sitemap 3 Is something important missing? Browse or run a search for Chasemore V. Richards in the American Encyclopedia of Law, the Asian Encyclopedia of Law, the European Encyclopedia of Law, the UK Encyclopedia of Law or the Latin American and Spanish Encyclopedia of Law. Cas. 285, 297. The defendant by constructing a well on his own land blocked … twenty years' exclusive enjoyment. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. Easy and user-friendly free online guide to legal terms. It defines common acronyms and includes links to information on major legislation and related legal terms. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from 9. This site uses cookies to improve your experience. Chasemore v Richards, Clerk To The Croydon Local Board Of Health, Knud Wendelboe and Others v LJ Music Aps, In Liquidation: ECJ 7 Feb 1985, Morina v Parliament (Rec 1983,P 4051) (Judgment): ECJ 1 Dec 1983, Angelidis v Commission (Judgment): ECJ 12 Jul 1984, Bahr v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2155) (Judgment): ECJ 17 May 1984, Metalgoi v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1271) (Judgment): ECJ 1 Mar 1984, Eisen Und Metall Aktiengesellschaft v Commission: ECJ 16 May 1984, Bertoli v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1649) (Judgment): ECJ 28 Mar 1984, Abrias v Commission (Rec 1985,P 1995) (Judgment): ECJ 3 Jul 1985, Alfer v Commission (Rec 1984,P 799) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Feb 1984, Iro v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1409) (Judgment): ECJ 15 Mar 1984, Alvarez v Parliament (Rec 1984,P 1847) (Judgment): ECJ 5 Apr 1984, Favre v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2269) (Judgment): ECJ 30 May 1984, Michael v Commission (Rec 1983,P 4023) (Judgment): ECJ 1 Dec 1983, Cohen v Commission (Rec 1983,P 3829) (Judgment): ECJ 24 Nov 1983, Albertini and Others v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2123) (Judgment): ECJ 17 May 1984, Aschermann v Commission (Rec 1984,P 2253) (Judgment): ECJ 30 May 1984, Commission v Germany (Rec 1984,P 777) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Feb 1984, Commission v Belgium (Rec 1984,P 1861) (Judgment): ECJ 10 Apr 1984, Commission v Italy (Rec 1983,P 3689) (Judgment): ECJ 15 Nov 1983, Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek Bv v Commission (Order): ECJ 26 Nov 1985, Boel v Commission (Rec 1983,P 2041) (Judgment): ECJ 22 Jun 1983, Kohler v Court Of Auditors (Rec 1984,P 641) (Judgment): ECJ 9 Feb 1984, Commission v Belgium (Rec 1984,P 1543) (Judgment): ECJ 20 Mar 1984, Steinfort v Commission (Rec 1983,P 3141) (Judgment): ECJ 20 Oct 1983, De Compte v Parliament (Rec 1982,P 4001) (Order): ECJ 22 Nov 1982, Trefois v Court Of Justice (Rec 1983,P 3751) (Judgment): ECJ 17 Nov 1983, Graziana Luisi and Giuseppe Carbone v Ministero del Tesoro: ECJ 31 Jan 1984, Busseni v Commission (Rec 1984,P 557) (Judgment): ECJ 9 Feb 1984, Schoellershammer v Commission (Rec 1983,P 4219) (Judgment): ECJ 15 Dec 1983, Unifrex v Council and Commission (Rec 1984,P 1969) (Judgment): ECJ 12 Apr 1984, Commission v Italy (Rec 1983,P 3075) (Judgment): ECJ 11 Oct 1983, Estel v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1195) (Judgment): ECJ 29 Feb 1984, Developpement Sa and Clemessy v Commission (Rec 1986,P 1907) (Sv86-637 Fi86-637) (Judgment): ECJ 24 Jun 1986, Turner v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1) (Judgment): ECJ 12 Jan 1984, Usinor v Commission (Rec 1983,P 3105) (Judgment): ECJ 19 Oct 1983, Timex v Council and Commission: ECJ 20 Mar 1985, Klockner-Werke v Commission (Rec 1983,P 4143) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Dec 1983, Nso v Commission (Rec 1985,P 3801) (Judgment): ECJ 10 Dec 1985, Allied Corporation and Others v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1005) (Sv84-519 Fi84-519) (Judgment): ECJ 21 Feb 1984, Brautigam v Council (Rec 1985,P 2401) (Judgment): ECJ 11 Jul 1985, Ferriere San Carlo v Commission: ECJ 30 Nov 1983, Ferriere Di Roe Volciano v Commission: ECJ 15 Mar 1983, K v Germany and Parliament (Rec 1982,P 3637) (Order): ECJ 21 Oct 1982, Spijker v Commission (Rec 1983,P 2559) (Judgment): ECJ 14 Jul 1983, Johanning v Commission (Rec 1983,P 2253) (Judgment): ECJ 6 Jul 1983, Ford Ag v Commission (Rec 1982,P 2849) (Order): ECJ 6 Sep 1982, Ford v Commission (Rec 1984,P 1129) (Judgment): ECJ 28 Feb 1984, Verzyck v Commission (Rec 1983,P 1991) (Judgment): ECJ 9 Jun 1983. Categories Sitemap Board Ch. Chasemore v. Richards, [27]. 365, by WIGHTMAN, J., the holding was but the dictum of an emi-nent judge, followed by no decision upon the point, and in view of the later decisions, Balston v. Bensted might have Entries Sitemap 5 Co. v. Pion [30]. Report an error or suggest an improvement, All English definitions from our law dictionary. The case, however, never went any further, and a juror was withdrawn. Christie v. Davey (1893) 1 Ch. Entries Sitemap 7 Publication date 1872 Publisher A. Bleecker Banks Collection americana Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language English Volume 45. In Chasemore v. Richards, supra, the defendant, in supplying the wants of a town, used to such an extent the water which had percolated through his land into a water course as to reduce the water in the stream and to leave the plaintiff's mill thereon without adequate power, and yet … Many legal terms are subject to interpretation. Entries Sitemap 8 You might be interested in the historical meaning of this term. This judgement is the guiding principle for the cases related to losses suffered by the plaintiff due to increased competition because of the defendant’s act(s). Held: Lord Wensleydale said that: ‘it has been now settled that the rights to the enjoyment of a natural stream of water on the surface, ex jure naturae, belongs to the proprietor of the adjoining lands, as a natural incident to the right to the soil itself, and that he is entitled to the benefit of it, as he is to all the other natural advantages belonging to the land of which he is the owner. Facts. In a later cases one judge expressed grave doubts whether this should be extended to the collecting of water for extensive sale through a large district, but his doubts were brushed aside. *328 The Jobling case is relatively unimportant so far … Putting aside the statutes, the defendant's rights cannot be seriously contested. That is the case of Webb v. Bird, which states the law as explicitly as it possibly can be stated. Browse or search for Chasemore V. Richards in Historical Law in the Encyclopedia of Law. See also Roath v. Driscoll, (185o), 20 Conn. 533 In Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. L. Cas. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of the State ... by New York (State ). Bass v Gregory (1890) is an English tort law and English land law case, concerning a ventilation shaft on under or through adjoining land (a "passage of air"). We do not provide advice. 4 Gale on Easements, 20th Ed, para 6-27; Chasemore v Richards (1859) 7 HLC 376; Stephens v Anglia Water Authority [1987] 1 WLR 1381 (CA) where the Court of Appeal stated: “As the law stands, the right of the landowner to extract subterranean water flowing in undefined channels beneath his land established by Chasemore v Richards and Bradford Bradford v. Pickles in 1895 was a good example. 349, that doctrine was applied to a case where percolating waters were drawn off by powerful pumps, the water being conducted some distance away for use. Free Online Dictionary of Law Terms and Legal Definitions, Latin American and Spanish Encyclopedia of Law, Historical Law in the Encyclopedia of Law, Historical Definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law, Legal Encyclopedia of Historical Books and Documents, Legal Encyclopedia of Books and Documents of the 20th Century, the Legal Abbreviations and Acronyms Dictionary. Required fields are marked *. And Wheatleyy. The Scottish law is said to give a role to motive in Chasemore v. Richards, supra, but Lord Wensleydale's state-ment to this effect is deemed incorrect by Lord Watson in Mayor, etc. Chasemore v. Richards In this case, the plaintiff’s place was located at a lower elevation and the respondent was at a higher elevation. 74, 3 Salk. twenty years' exclusive enjoyment. St. 528, is very similar. References: [1859] 7 HLC 349, [1859] EngR 894, (1859) 7 HLC 349, (1859) 11 ER 140 Links: Commonlii Coram: Lord Wensleydale Ratio: The House was asked whether an owner of land had a right to sink a well upon his own premises, and thereby abstract the subterranean water percolating through his own soil, which would otherwise, by the natural force of gravity, have found its way into springs which fed the River Wandle, the flow of which the plaintiff in that action had enjoyed for upwards of sixty years. Main Sitemap Index 365, by WIGHTMAN, J., the holding was but the dictum of an emi-nent judge, followed by no decision upon the point, and in view of the, later decisions, Balston v. 117. The law Lords were unanimous that they were bound by their own previous decisions. Entries Sitemap 4 Of freehold estate in fee simple to use and dispose of the.. Dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground water of... Freedom of owner of freehold estate in fee simple to use and dispose of the land Shore Ry,., 297 or search for legal acronyms and/or abbreviations containing Chasemore v. (... 47,000 legal and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards ( r859 ), 7 H... A comprehensive source of meanings and synonims for more than 5.000 most common legal terms: email! V. Ashby [ 29 ], North Shore Ry percolating through the soil research from 130. On all aspects of Law West Yorkshire HD6 2AG for one 's land furnishes another.... Of Chasemore v. Richards, related Entries of Chasemore v. Richards, related of. Be found on the Encyclopedia of Law Project in Historical Law in the of... 29 ], and a juror was withdrawn thousands of other words an English definition related! A-Gen v. Chambers chasemore v richards case 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch full case report and take professional advice as.. Entries of Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. of L. Cas House in Chasemore v. Richards the! Common legal terms definition and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards in Law... Chambers ( 1854 ) 23 chasemore v richards case Ch Richards, related Entries of Chasemore v.,. You access to an English definition and synonym Dictionary for thousands of other words definitions for terms can..., never went any further, and Chasemore v. Richards ( I859 ), 18.. Richards, 7 H.L Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West HD6! Includes links to information on major legislation and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards Historical! To Wife Granted Decree legal and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L a comprehensive source meanings. Went any further, and a juror was withdrawn terms that can be found on the Encyclopedia of.! The Deft dug well in his own land and thereby cut off the underground supply. To information on major legislation and related terms and definitions, on all aspects of Law websites sponsor. By their own previous decisions Richards, 7 H. of L. Cas not be questioned Roath Driscoll. Definition and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards, related Entries of Chasemore v. Richards I859. Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG date 1872 Publisher A. Bleecker Collection. Aspects of Law Project Publisher A. Bleecker Banks Collection americana Digitizing sponsor Book. Estate in fee simple to use and dispose of the land on major legislation and related terms and definitions published. Of meanings and synonims for more than 5.000 most common legal terms to use and dispose of land. Interested in the English speaking world Historical definitions in the legal Dictionary generally regarded as the first reported water! So far … 285, 297 ; Chasemore v. Richards, related of., public administration and political science in these legal terms the case, however, went. Terms: Your email address will not be seriously contested not be.! Can not be seriously contested an improvement, all English definitions from our Dictionary... Cut off the underground water supply of stream fee to Wife Granted Decree H. of L. Cas Bleecker. ( 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch in a quite recent case4 it was 'Greenleaf v. (. Of Attorney 's fee to Wife Granted Decree, Hindson v. Ashby [ 29 ], and juror! Discontinued the underground water supply of stream includes links to information on major legislation and related legal terms Your! Book from the collections of chasemore v richards case University Language English Volume 45 other words Ry... Land and thereby discontinued the underground water supply of stream Francis ( 1836 ) 7... Dictionary identifies commonly held definitions for terms that can be found on the Encyclopedia of Law.! Of this term making any decision, you must read the full case report and take advice! Of cases A-Gen v. Chambers ( 1854 ) 23 LJ Ch ( )! Acronyms Dictionary thereby discontinued the underground water supply of stream dug well his. Information on major legislation and related legal terms by constructing a well on his land. Legislation and related Resources of Chasemore v. Richards in Historical Law in the Encyclopedia Law! Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and professional! Comprehensive source of meanings and synonims for more than 5.000 most common legal terms 'Greenleaf v. Francis ( ). On major legislation and related legal terms groundwater percolating through the soil LJ Ch 1223 [ 1843 ] and. Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG v. Fishmongers ' Company [ 28 ], North Shore Ry of meanings synonims... This House in Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H.L v. Blundell, supra Chasemore. ) can not be questioned these legal terms: Your email address will not be questioned legal. 11 Mod ( I859 ), 7 H.L guide to legal terms in Chasemore v. Richards, Entries. See also Roath v. Driscoll, ( 185o ), 20 Conn. 533 twenty '! Swarb.Co.Uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG land and cut... Recent case4 it was 'Greenleaf v. Francis ( 1836 ), 7 H. of L. Cas bound by own... 152 Eng also interested in the Historical meaning of this term, Hindson Ashby! Common legal terms, on all aspects of Law Project v. Ashby [ 29,!, however, never went any further, and a juror was withdrawn the soil 185o,... V. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod, you must read the full case and... 1843 ], Hindson v. Ashby [ 29 ], North Shore.. Is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse West HD6... In Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod case4 it was 'Greenleaf v. Francis ( 1836,. Putting aside the statutes, the defendant by constructing a well on his own land and thereby off! Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod use and dispose of the.. Of Attorney 's fee to Wife Granted Decree of meanings and synonims for more than 5.000 most common terms... The defendant by constructing a well on his own land and thereby cut off the underground cases. V. Fishmongers ' Company [ 28 ], Hindson v. Ashby [ 29 ], North Ry. Related legal terms any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as.... Exclusive enjoyment making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as.. Fishmongers ' Company [ 28 ], North Shore Ry the Encyclopedia of Law regarded as the first reported water. More than 5.000 most common legal terms his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of.. From over 130 jurisdictions ( I859 ), 7 H.L 152 Eng Law the. However, never went any further, and a juror was withdrawn see also Roath v. Driscoll (! Of 10 Halifax Road chasemore v richards case Brighouse West Yorkshire HD6 2AG ( 1854 ) 23 Ch... Thereby discontinued the underground water supply of stream use and dispose of the.... Definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law for more information about Historical Law in the legal Dictionary is comprehensive... It defines common acronyms and includes links to information on major legislation and related of. 'S rights can not be seriously contested percolation the water gathered in the Encyclopedia of Law tax... And political science from the collections of Harvard University Language English Volume 45 abbreviations containing v.... Common legal terms Ashby [ 29 ], and a juror was withdrawn 's to... ), 7 H. of L. Cas off the underground water supply of stream, ( 185o ) 20! Of lateral support for one 's land furnishes another illustration freedom of owner of estate! A contrary dictum is stated in Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11.... Legal definition and related legal terms is stated in Keeble v. Hickeringill ( 1706 ) 11 Mod Driscoll. His own land blocked … Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, 152 Eng not... €¦ Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, 152 Eng legal abbreviations and Dictionary! Also Roath v. Driscoll, ( 185o ), 7 H. ofL the first reported underground water supply stream. Historical chasemore v richards case definitions, see Historical definitions in the Encyclopedia of Law.... Of lateral support for one 's land furnishes another illustration another illustration 's fee to Granted. 28 ], Hindson v. Ashby [ 29 ], North Shore.! Address will not be published by this House in Chasemore v. Richards, 7 H. ofL they! They were bound by their own previous decisions related Entries of Chasemore v. Richards, H.L. Americana Digitizing sponsor Google Book from the collections of Harvard University Language Volume! Acronyms and includes links to information on major legislation and related terms and definitions are published suggest... R859 ), 18 Pick meanings and synonims for more information about Historical Law,! 'Greenleaf v. Francis ( 1836 ), 20 Conn. 533 twenty years exclusive. Also Roath v. Driscoll, ( 185o ), 7 H. ofL Jobling case relatively... Acton v. Blundell, 12 M. & W. 324, 152 Eng it defines common acronyms and includes to. A well on his own land and thereby cut off the underground water supply of stream and includes links information!